|
Read!
|
Essay Title |
Preview
|
Availability |
Get the books:
|
|
|
2008: The year of EQC, AQC, or no QC at all? |
|
Public |

Basic Method Validation, SECOND EDITION!

Basic QC Practices Manual
SECOND EDITION!!

Basic Planning
for Quality manual
|
|
|
The Quality of Glycated Hemoglobin (Ghb) |
|
Public |
|
|
Equivocal QC: Coming to a Lab near you |
|
Public |
|
|
A War of Words in Laboratory Terminology, Part III |
|
Public |
|
|
A War of Words in Laboratory Terminology, Part II |
|
Public |
|
|
A War of Words in Laboratory Terminology? |
|
Public |
|
|
"But...is it really out?" |
|
Public |
|
|
Errors In, Before, Behind the Laboratory? |
|
Public |
|
|
The Health of US Healthcare |
|
Public |
|
|
CLSI faces the Challenge of Quality |
|
Public |
|
|
The Meaning and Application of Total Error |
|
Public |
|
|
Spotting Quality Internationally: Antwerp Meetings |
|
Public |
|
|
Truthful Guidance about Trueness |
|
Public |
|
|
Truthful Claims may not be enough |
|
Public |
|
|
In 2007, Method Validation Skills are Still Vital |
|
Public |
|
|
Global and Local Imperatives in US Healthcare |
|
Public |
|
|
Why We Write. |
|
Public |
|
|
2006: Links to South Africa |
|
Public |
|
|
GLP for Lab QC: Part II |
|
Public |
|
|
GLP for Lab QC: Part I |
|
Public |
|
|
2006: Links to Spain |
|
Public |
|
|
2006: Links to Argentina |
|
Public |
|
|
Thank you... |
|
Public |
|
|
Rumors of my Retirement are somewhat exaggerated... |
|
Public |
|
|
GAO Report: the agencies respond |
|
Public |
|
|
GAO Report on Recommendations: good, bad, and irrelevant |
|
Public |
|
|
GAO Report on CMS - it's out |
|
Public |
|
|
Update on Quality Design Tools |
|
Public |
|
|
What's the Laboratory's Core Competency? |
|
Public |
|
|
Open Letter to CLSI |
|
Public |
|
|
Trouble with Tracking Tests |
|
Public |
|
|
Quality Indicators and Benchmarks |
|
Public |
|
|
Hopeful Healthcare in a Fearful Society |
|
Public |
|
|
Unannounced Inspections: Unlikely to improve quality |
|
Public |
|
|
100,000 miles to Quality: 2005 in Review |
|
Public |
|
|
QC: Not just a technicality |
|
Public |
|
|
Links to India, Part II |
|
Public |
|
|
Method Performance and Test Quality: Same thing? |
|
Public |
|
|
Links to India, Part I |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of PT Sigma Metrics |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of Coagulation Testing |
|
Public |
|
|
Solutions for a Taxing Problem |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of PSA Testing |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of Glycohemoglobin Testing |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of Calcium Testing |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of Glucose Testing |
|
Public |
|
|
Bah, Humbug! A look back at 2004 and EQC |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of Cholesterol Testing |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of Laboratory Testing, Part II: Methodology |
|
Public |
|
|
Vioxx and Values, Vaccines and Votes |
|
Public |
|
|
Remarks at the G2 Conference: "No Lab Left Behind" |
|
Public |
|
|
The Quality of Laboratory Testing, Part I |
|
Public |
|
|
Maryland General, Part V: Tip of the Iceberg? |
|
Public |
|
|
Maryland General, Part IV: Inadequate Inspections |
|
Public |
|
|
Connecting the Dots |
|
Public |
|
|
Maryland General, Part III: Broken Windows at Maryland General Hospital |
|
Public |
|
|
Maryland General, Part II: Facts of the Maryland General Healthcare Scandal |
|
Public |
|
|
Maryland General, Part I: Cracks in the Healthcare System? |
|
Public |
|
|
Is the CLIA Final Rule the Final Word? |
|
Public |
|
|
Testing Equivalent Quality: A Better Way |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
More on CLIA and "Quality-Less Compliance" |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Quality Management - the gospel according to ISO |
|
Public |
|
|
Think straight, Talk straight |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Autoverification: Taking QC to the next level - is that up or down? |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Giving Thanks for 2003: Some observations on the state of QC |
|
Public |
|
|
Medical Errors: Complexity and its solution |
|
Public, Truth |
 |
ISO Says So:
NCCLS recommendations for Validation of User QC |
 |
Public, Truth |
 |
2004 JCAHO Patient Safety Goals -
What our goals say about where we are now |
 |
Public. Truth |
|
|
It's an Honor - personal reflections on being a teacher |
|
Public, Truth |
 |
"The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" -
A Demanding Standard for Quality |
 |
Public, Truth |
|
|
The Final5 CLIA Rule 1/24/03 |
|
Public |
|
|
Good Data Wanted - Bad Data Need Not Apply |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Signs of Six Sigma |
|
Public |
|
|
A Momentous Happening - A New Way to Do QC! |
|
Public |
|
|
Cooking the Books - Does it happen in the laboratory? |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Quality: "I think I got it!" |
|
Public |
|
|
Why not evidence-based method specifications? |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Has quality been "Enronned"? |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
$aving the Cost$ of Poor Quality (Six Sigma) |
|
Public |
|
|
Technology for implementing QC Right |
|
Public |
|
|
Six Sigma Staffing Strategies |
|
Public |
|
|
Repeated, repeated, got lucky! |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
CLIA postponed again and again and again |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
2001: Year of the Odyssey |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Six Sigma and Requisite Laboratory QC |
|
Public |
|
|
Six Sigma Quality Managment |
|
Public |
|
|
Errors in Reasoning about Laboratory Errors |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Quality is Job 1 when the Rubber meets the Road |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Who will care for quality tomorrow? |
|
Public |
|
|
EZ Rules for Quality Assurance |
|
Public |
|
|
Sage Advice on "New Approaches to Quality Control" |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
WQC Y2K: Plans, Predictions and Predicaments |
|
Public |
|
|
The Abbott-FDA Consent Decree? A Wake-Up Call for Laboratories |
|
Public |
|
|
The Do's and Don'ts of Quality Control |
|
Public |
|
|
Education and Training for Analytical Quality Management,
Part IV: Internet tools for Training |
|
Public |
|
|
Quality Control 2000: What changes are needed? |
|
Public |
|
|
To be Uncertain or in Error? That is the question |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
What's wrong with traditional Quality Control? |
|
Public |
|
|
The Need for a System of Quality Requirements |
|
Public |
|
|
Z-Stats: Those #$%@&! Statistics |
|
Public |
|
|
Quality Requirements: The Debate Heats up! |
|
Public |
|
|
Points of Care for Statistics in Method-Comparison Studies |
|
Public |
|
|
Beijing abstract: QC Principles, Practices, and Planning |
|
Public |
|
|
From Rules and Tools to Technology and Training |
|
Public |
|
|
Electronic QC and the Total Testing Process |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
Education and Training for Analytical Quality Management,
Part III: Basic QC Training |
|
Public |
|
|
Principles of QC Planning for Immunoassays |
|
Public, BMV |
|
|
Method Validation:
The Inner, Hidden, Deeper, Secret Meaning |
|
Public, BMV |
|
|
Education and Training for Analytical Quality Management,
Part II: Developing Internet courses |
|
Public |
|
|
Quality and Commerce |
|
Public |
|
|
QC - "Back to Basics" |
|
Public, BQC |
|
|
Mapping the Road to Quality with OPSpecs Charts |
|
Public |
|
|
Education and Training for Analytical Quality Management,
Part I: Developing a "Lesson-Base" |
|
Public |
|
|
Tools and Technology for QC Planning |
|
Public |
|
|
Quality by Design |
|
Public, Truth |
|
|
The Myth of Medical Decision Limits |
|
Public |
|
|
Future Directions in Quality Control |
|
Public |
|
|
Quality Goals, Requirements, and Specifications |
|
Public |
|
|
Trends in Quality management: Utilization and Outcomes |
|
Public |
|
|
Assuring Quality through Total Quality Management (TQM) |
|
Public |
|
|
Putting Quality into Quality Control |
|
Public |
|
|
Myths of Quality |
|
Public, BMV |
The Myths of Quality
|
We like to assume that everything works perfectly in today's
healthcare laboratory; that analytical quality is a given; that
even if we don't know what quality we need to achieve, we're
achieving it; that today's methods have better imprecision and
inaccuracy than needed; that no further improvements are necessary
in the QC of the 21st century. Dr. Westgard discusses these myths,
sorting fact from fiction, and providing commentaries.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Putting Quality into Quality
Control
|
Many laboratories and manufacturers say that they "do"
quality control - but can't explain what level of quality they're
acheiving. The term "Quality Control" is much-abused.
In many cases, Dr. Westgard explains that what laboratories are
actually performing is arbitrary control, not quality
control. How do we put the quality back into quality control?
Reading this essay is a good start.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Assuring Quality through Total Quality
Management (TQM)
|
The teachings of industrial quality gurus, such as Deming
and Juran, established new principles and processes for managing
quality. Deming provided the principles for what needs to be
done and Juran described the methodologies or processes for getting
it done. See how a combination of these two - Total Quality Management
(TQM) - can be applied to the healthcare laboratory field.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Trends in Quality management: Utilization
and Outcomes
|
Re-engineering, out-sourcing, down-sizing, outcomes focus
-- all the management fads have come to the healthcare laboratory
with a vengeance. Dr. Westgard (with a little help from Dilbert)
sorts out which approaches are valid and which are dangerous.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality Goals, Requirements, and Specifications
|
Everyone agrees that there should be quality control. But
what does that mean? When we implement new methods in our laboratories,
or develop new methods, or try to establish regulatory guidelines
for performance of methods, or even inspect laboratories to assure
that good quality management practices have been implemented,
how do we specify bias, CV, the number of controls, the levels,
etc.? Dr. Westgard introduces a way to sort it all out.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Future directions in Quality Control
|
Total Laboratory Automation and POC devices are two trends
in current diagnostic equipment. Dr. Westgard reviews the history
of quality control, from manual methodsin the 1950s, to the current
state of the art of laboratory fourth generation instrumentation,
to the quality control systems in future instruments. Learn how
automation and computerization will impact the future quality
control practices - what will be done for us, and what we still
have to do for ourselves.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Myth of Medical Decision Limits
|
Medical Decision Limits are described as a "second set
of limits set for control values ...meant to be a wider set of
limits indicating the range of medically acceptable results."
The idea is that these medical decision limits embody the medical
usefulness requirement for a test and by drawing these limits
on our control charts, we will detect medically significant errors.
Using CLIA QC requirements and practical examples, Dr. Westgard
evaluates these MDLs and reveals their true nature.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality by Design
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
If we're honest with ourselves, we know that the situation
in the laboratory needs to be improved. But with all the time
pressures, staff shortages, and other stresses, how can we find
a quick way to put the quality back into quality control? How
do we select methods that can guarantee error detection? Create
purchase specifications to select instruments that can guarantee
we meet our CLIA requirements? Design instruments with quality
in mind? Dr. Westgard suggests practical steps that both users
and manufacturers can take to bring quality into their design.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Tools and Technology for QC Planning
|
Just as instruments have evolved from manual pipettes to vast
automated instruments, so too has the technology for quality
control. When we're using a fourth generation instrument, should
be be doing first generation quality control (like the old standby,
1:2s), a practice that was introduced in the 1950's? Dr. Westgard
charts the history and progress of QC technology and introduces
new tools (QC Selection grids, OPSpecs charts, automated QC selection)
that we can use for the 21st century.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Education and Training in Analytical
Quality Management, Part I: Developing a Lesson-Base
|
The Digital Age has revolutionized countless facets of our
society. Dr. Westgard discusses how the Internet it has and will
impact our industry: how we can now access education and training
over the web at anytime, from anywhere in the world. (If you
can read this, you're part of the revolution!). Read this essay
to see how workshops, courses, seminars and more will be affected
by electronic communication.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Mapping the Road to Analytical Quality
with Charts of Operating Specifications
|
Quality is often described as a journey. Too often our
efforts describe where we've been and how we arrived at the present,
rather than advancing to where we need to be in the future. Laboratory
efforts need to advance quality with well-defined destinations, maps
to guide us to those destinations, and careful planning to provide
a smooth journey. The way is revealed.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
QC - "Back to Basics"
|
Dr. Westgard explains the bare minimum everyone needs to know,
and goes on to detail what laboratory technicians, medical technologists,
clinical laboratory scientists, clinical chemists, QC specialists,
supervisors, managers, and even directors need to know about
quality control in their laboratory. If you see your title on
this list, check out the essay and find out if you know all you
should know.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality and Commerce
|
A discussion of Westgard QC and its new offerings - more online
courses, more downloads, more information,
and the ability to order our products directly through the website.
How do we balance our educational offerings with our commercial
ones? Dr. Westgard talks about this delicate juggling act and
invites your comments.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Education and Training in Analytical
Quality Management, Part II: Developing Internet courses
|
You may not know this (we hope you do), but Westgard QC offers
several online courses for education and training. How do we
do this? Here's a behind-the-scenes discussion of how we develop
"just-in-time" courses for college courses, workshops,
seminars, and continuing education courses for clinical chemists
and clinical laboratory scientists.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Method Validation: The Inner,
Hidden, Deeper, Secret Meaning
|
We run controls, we collect data, we create graphs and charts
and plots and crunch numbers. Then we stuff it all in a folder
and hand it to an inspector. It's called method validation. But
what is it? How do we do it? Why do we do it? Dr. Westgard reveals
the secret meaning behind it all.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Principles of QC Planning for Immunoassays
|
Dr. Westgard takes the theory and tools of quality planning
and applies it to immunoassays. This was part of his presentation
to the joint meeting of UK National External Quality Assessment
Schemes (UK NEQAS) for Endocrinology and the European Ligand
Assay Society (ELAS) in Edinburgh, Scotland,
a paper that he delivered "virtually" to the conference.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Education and Training for Analytical
Quality Management, Part III: Basic QC Practices training
|
Over the years, the practice of quality control has been corrupted
(all those repeat runs, widening control limits, and even worse).
It's time to get back to the basics. To that end, using all the
technology of the late 20th and early 21st century, Dr. Westgard
introduces a Basic QC Practices training course available online,
on CD, and in one of those "old-fashioned" books.
(If you ask nicely, he'll probably do it in person at your next
conference, too.)
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Electronic QC and the Total Testing
Process
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
POC devices are all the rage. But they don't do normal QC,
they do "electronic QC". Just what is "electronic
QC"? What does it really measure? And is it
ever going to replace the real thing? Dr. Westgard provides
a lucid hype-free discussion.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
From Rules and Tools to Technology
and Training
|
At the Fourth European Conference Quality [r]evolution in
Clinical Laboratories, in Antwerp, Belgium,
Dr. Westgard charted the course of the recent developments in
quality control. He covers the introduction of the original multirule
("Westgard Rules") to the introduction of the OPSpecs
chart, to software-automated QC selection, to the future applications
of embedded software in instrumentation and laboratory information
systems.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
QC Principles, Practices and Planning
|
An excerpt from Dr. Westgard's address to the Conference on
Quality Control of Clinical Chemistry Organized by the National
Center for Clinical Laboratories, in Beijing, China. See how
natural variation in test data gives rise to statistical monitoring,
how statistical monitoring gives rise to multirule control (aka
"Westgard Rules"), and how multirule control gives
rise to operating specifications, quality planning, and practical
tools.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Points of care in using statistics
in Method-Comparison Studies
|
A top 10 list of things you should know about method validation.
If you're not sure you're using the right statistics, the right
regression, or the right plots and graphs, read here.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality Requirements: The Debate
heats up!
|
After years of neglect, people are beginning to get interested
in the issue of what quality requirements are, where they come
from, and which ones must be met by today's laboratory. Dr. Westgard
gives an introduction to some of the issues and suggests a system
of quality requirements is needed to accomodate different approaches
and applications.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Z-stats: Those #$%@! statistics
|
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics. Why do we fear
and distrust statistics? Dr. Westgard ponders the subject and
suggests that the reason QC in the laboratory is suffering may
be because of our attitudes. Luckily, there's a remedy...
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Need for a System of Quality
Standards
|
We've got TEa, performance criteria, clinical outcome criteria,
proficiency testing criteria, total biologic goals, and, of course,
"state of the art." It's no wonder people are confused
about quality requirements. Find out how
CLIA, NCEP, biological goals, clinical decision intervals, and
other quality standards can (and should) be reconciled.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
What's wrong with traditional quality
control?
|
Dr. Westgard addresses the Frequently-Made-Complaints (FMC's)
about statistical quality control. Over the years, a whole host
of gripes have accumulated. Learn which of them are valid criticisms
and which of them are just plain whining.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
To be uncertain or in error? That
is the question
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Do you know the new ISO terms? Dr.
Westgard weighs in on the new terminology and suggests there
are practical applications for the new uncertainty concepts
as well as the old error concepts. He also asks, should
we be spending time improving terminology or improving lab performance?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality Control 2000: What changes
are needed?
|
Forget about Y2K - what about Y2QC? What's going to happen
to quality control in the laboratory? Are we going to give it
up entirely? Will there be any people left in the automated laboratory?
Dr. Westgard attempts to predict and recommend changes
for this new millenium.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Education and Training in Analytical
Quality Management, Part IV: Internet Tools for Training
|
You've built a "lesson-base." You've created an
online course. You've addressed the need to teach basic skills.
Now what's missing? Of course: interactive tools for the Internet.
Plotters, calculators and data simulation tools that allow the
user to plug in numbers on the fly and see what happens. See
the new tools and what you can do with them.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Do's and Don'ts of Quality Control
|
Dr. Westgard makes it simple and gives a primer on how to
avoid excessive repeat runs, inspection failures, and maybe even
larger problems.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Abbott-FDA Consent Decree: A
Wake-Up Call for Laboratories
|
A $100,000,000 fine? What's up? The
recent Abbott-FDA Consent Decree resulted in a such a hugh penalty
because of a long standing failure to comply with FDA's Good
Manufacturing Practices or Quality System Regulation.
How does this affect you? Dr. Westgard explains how the
Consent Decree should alert laboratories and manufacturers of
the importance of an independent laboratory quality system that
assures the quality of routine test results.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
WQC Y2K: Plans, Priorities and Predicaments
|
The new millenium will bring many changes for Westgard QC.
Dr. Westgard explains all the new features, products and services
that will come from this website and the company. There are plans,
priorities and predicaments. We want you to know what we're up
to, and we'd love to hear what you think.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Sage Advice on "New Approaches
to Quality Control"
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Dr. Westgard recently attended an AACC meeting on "New
Approaches to Quality Control." Statistical QC was implemented
in industry in the 1930's and in the healthcare field in the
1960's. It's still faithfully used in industry today, but for
some reason a lot of people in healthcare want to give up on
it. Dr. Westgard summarizes the "new" thinking and
examines some of the underlying reasoning.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
EZ Rules for Quality Assurance
|
Dr. Westgard gives a sneak preview of our newest software.
EZ Rules is a simple interview format program that makes it simple,
easy, fast, and automatic to plan quality.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Who will care for quality tomorrow?
|
There is a crisis in laboratory staffing; the demand for laboratory
professionals has exceeded the supply by thousands. Yet fewer
and fewer students are pursuing medical technology. Dr. Westgard
examines why this is, what impact it will have on the laboratory,
and what solutions will be devised to deal with the scarcity
of staffing.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality is Job 1 when the Rubber
meets the Road
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Yes, it's a mixed metaphor. It's also an essay on the Ford/Firestone
debacle, and what it means to us in healthcare laboratories.
First we saw the $100 million fine on Abbott, now the recall
of millions of defective tires. When will we realize that higher
management has a problem with quality?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Errors in Reasoning about Laboratory
Errors
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
What's scarier? The fact that there are errors in laboratories,
or the fact that we don't understand what those errors mean?
A lot of logically dubious arguments have been put forward about
reducing QC, ignoring QC, or eliminating the practice of QC altogether.
Dr. Westgard examines and refutes the thinking behind these arguments.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Six Sigma Quality Management
|
Have you heard about Six-Sigma yet? It's the latest trend
in quality management. It has revolutionized business processes
in companies like GE and Motorola. The famed Jack Welch of GE
even made it a mandatory requirement that all executives learn
and practice Six Sigma. Dr. Westgard explains what's new about
this approach, what's hype, and what can be applied in the laboratory.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Six Sigma and Requisite Laboratory
QC
|
In the healthcare market, a lot of manufacturers are issuing
products with more of an eye on their profit margin than on the
quality of the product. If your manufacturer can't meet Six Sigma
requirements, what can you do? Improve your internal laboratory
QC -- Dr. Westgard explains how.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
2001: Year of the Odyssey
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
This isn't the first nor probably the last article to compare
this year to the landmark film 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Over 32 years ago, Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke predicted
a world of routine space travel, giant computers, and vast possibility.
Has our 2001 met these expectations -- in the laboratory? Dr.Westgard
muses on what laboratory professionals thought back in 1968 and
how things have "changed" since then.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
CLIA postponed again and again and
again
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
For the third time in a row, the CLIA manufacturer clearance
requirements for QC clearance have been postponed. What's taking
so long? Why can't HCFA and DHSS come to a conclusion? Are the
manufacturers exercising some undue influence? Better than answering
these questions, Dr. Westgard suggests that we shouldn't wait
for more CLIA rules. We have enough rules to go on right now
- and here's how to use them to improve QC...
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Repeated, repeated, got lucky!
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Believe it or not, but this is an actual comment from an QC
action log (from a facility that shall remain nameless). At least
the author was being honest about how he/she was performing their
QC - by luck, not by science. If you still use 2s limits for
your controls, you need to read this article. If you still repeat
controls and runs until they're "in," you need to read
this article. And for anyone who thinks that QC is just fine,
you really, really need to read this article.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Six Sigma Staffing Strategies
|
Six Sigma not only tells you where you
can cut costs and improve quality, it's also a great staffing
indicator. See how Sigma-metrics can tell you where staff rotation
is possible, and where you need to put your best techs.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Technology for Implementing QC Right
|
What kind of software is available for
Quality Control? Is the software you get for "free"
up to the job?
Dr. Westgard provides a cogent survey of what's available in
today's market. He also highlights what features are important
in a QC program, as well as the features that still need to be
offered.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
$aving the Cost$ of Poor Quality
|
Contrary to popular business belief,
there are ways to improve quality and save money at the same
time. Six Sigma is founded on that core philosophy. But where
are the savings in the laboratory? Here's a hard fact: poor QC
practices are wasting money in your laboratory RIGHT NOW. Dr.
Westgard shows how to identify, quantify, and eliminate the wasted
time, effort, and resources spent on repeat runs, repeated controls,
and poor patient care. Six Sigma Cost Worksheets are included
and can be downloaded.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Has Quality been "Enronned"?
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
As we watch the unfolding Enron scandal, it's tempting to
believe that those terrible practices could never happen in healthcare.
Alas, Dr. Westgard has examined the facts of the Enron case and
seen the hidden face of our healthcare industry. We have much
of Enron in our laboratories, our institutions, our regulators,
our control and diagnostics manufacturers, even in our professional
standards. Read this essay to see what we can learn -- and unlearn
-- from the Enron scandal.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Why not Evidence-based Method Specifications?
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
In the March issue of Clin Chem, the NACB published a long
paper about the use of laboratory tests for patients with diabetes.
Dr. Westgard examines their "evidence-based" recommendations,
and finds some poor Sigma values. See also the related QC applications:
Choosing QC for Glycated Hemoglobin and
Setting Specifications for Gylcated Hemoglobin
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality: "I think I got it!"
|
That was the oft-heard refrain at Westgard Workshops 2002.
For those of you who weren't able to attend the workshops, this
has pictures of what we did, quotes from those who came, and
some observations from Dr. Westgard on why these workshops are
so important and so successful.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Cooking the books - does it happen
in the laboratory?
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Enron, Arthur Andersen,Worldcom, the list goes on and on.
Corporate scandals have swept the nation. Executives have been
cooking the books and playing with the numbers. Are we in the
laboratory immune? Or have we been playing with our numbers,
too? Dr. Westgard examines some of the current laboratory practices,
including guidelines recently published, to see if the numbers
add up.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
A Momentous Happening - A New Way
to Do QC!
|
A new QC technology has been cleared that replaces the use
of traditional external quality controls. This happened because
a manufacturer submited a claim for this new QC technology and
provided the documentation to defend that claim. Read all about
it!
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Signs of Six Sigma
|
A few years ago, Dr. Westgard was one of the first and only
voices advocating the application of Six Sigma to healthcare
processes. Times have changed. Six Sigma is starting to pop up
everywhere. See where it's showing up today.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Good Data Wanted - Bad Data Need
Not Apply
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
The premier scientific journals have announced a new initiative
called STARD (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy)
What does STARD mean for you? And what does it say about the
data being reported in journals today? Dr. Westgard investigates.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Final5 CLIA Rule:
1/24/03
|
The final, final, final, final, final CLIA Rule was published
on January 24, 2003. After 15 years, CLIA-88 is finally final.
The last rules contain some big changes in terminology, organization,
and regulation. It promises to have a huge impact on the "compliance"
minimums for QC, on the responsibility for QC in the laboratory,
and on the requirements made on manufacturers to provide quality
instruments and methods. Read this essay, first of a series,
for in-depth and comprehensive coverage of these new rules.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing But the Truth - A Demanding Standard for Quality
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
As we look at the quality of laboratory medicine,
we need a demanding standard for judging the truth. See how some
new tests (hs-CRP) and new recommendations (diabetes) fare when
they're held up to the "the truth, the whole truth, and
nothing but the truth" standard.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
It's an Honor - personal reflections on being a teacher
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Dr. Westgard was given the 2003 Professor
Alvin Dubin award for Distinguished Contributions to the Discipline
and Practice of Clinical Biochemistry. The National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry presented the award to Dr. Westgard during the AACC meeting in Philadelphia. This occasion gave Dr. Westgard the opportunity to thank those who helped shape his career.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
2004 JCAHO Patient Safety Goals - What our goals say about where we are now
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
JCAHO just released its goals for patient safety. How we define our goals says a lot about what we're doing - or not doing - right now. See what next year's goals say about current patient safety.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
ISO Says So - Recommendations for Validation of User QC
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
The NCCLS came out with a recommendation on Validation of User QC for ISO. Dr. Westgard reviews these recommendations,
and examines the ISO system as a whole.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Medical Errors: Complexity and its solutions
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Recently, a JAMA study revealed that medical errors cost the US at least $9 billion in extra charges and treatment, and kill over 32,000 people, every year. Recently, a Misys software flaw was discovered, work-around-ed, and patched. Recently, everyone has been talking about getting their processes "Lean." What's the unifying thread here? Complexity and its many solutions: automation, computerization, and simplification. Examine the stories of the day and understand the source of today's problems - and maybe even understand where problems will occur in the future. .
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Giving Thanks for 2003 - some observations on the state of quality
|
December 2003
The year 2003 saw Dr. Westgard in 36 different cities in the US and 8 foreign countries. Dr. Westgard met with or spoke to over 5,000 professionals in the clinical lab sciences this year. After this whirlwind of travel and talk, he gives thanks and offers some observations on the state of Quality Management
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Autoverification: Taking QC to the next level - is that up or down?
|
January 2004
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Autoverification seems to be a hot topic these days. Articles are in the press, the journals, and soon to come audioconferences. But just what is autoverification, and how does it relate to QC? And if it doesn't involve QC, just what is really being verified?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Think Straight, Talk Straight
|
January 2004
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
Enron is in the news again, and Dr. Westgard has been studying their failings - and the ethics that they really practiced. What he finds is that our compliance mentality bears a considerable resemblance to the Enron accounting mentality. Really.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Quality Management - the Gospel According to ISO
|
In the face of failed CLIA regulations, where do we now turn? We may need to look to standards and practices outside the US. With this in mind, Dr. Westgard introduces a new series of articles about ISO and quality management. Guest authors Dr. Rogerio Rabelo and Dr. Daniel Perigo come to us from Fleury Diagnostics in Brazil, where they have experienced the ISO certification process.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
More on CLIA and "Quality-Less Compliance"
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
We've posted a large number of articles about the specifics of the Final CLIA Rule and the accompanying Interpretive Guidelines. But in addition to covering the specifics, we need to look at the big picture. Why did we get the CLIA Final Rule and Interpretive Guidelines the way that we did? Why did it take over ten years to complete? Why did manufacturer's QC clearance go by the wayside? How did we end up with "electronic QC" and "equivalent QC"?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Testing Equivalent Quality: A Better Way
|
An updated version of this essay appears on the Nothing but the Truth about Quality book.
CMS has created "equivalent QC", but the regulations really only allow "equivalent quality testing." This difference is important - and if "Eqc" is here to stay, finding the equivalent quality in testing is the only way to find a real solution. Finding that quality can be done, and done simply, using Sigma Metrics.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Is the Final Rule the Final Word?
|
On April 28, 2004, the AACC held its audioconference on “CLIA’88: Recent Changes, Future Directions,”. During that conference, the speakers were asked to respond to "our" position on "equivalent QC procedures." To respond to those responses, we want to clarify our concerns about "Eqc."
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Hearings on Untruth and Unquality, Part I: Cracks in the Healthcare System?
|
May 2004.
Dr. Westgard comments on the recent reports involving Maryland General Hospital and laboratory errors. The first in a series of articles on this developing story.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Hearings on Untruth and Unquality, Part II: Facts of the Maryland General Hospital Scandal
|
June 2004
For those of you who haven't been able to follow the scandal at Maryland General Hospital, here's a recap of the laboratory deficiencies, errors, and catastrophes - plus details on the congressional hearings on this issue.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Hearings on Untruth and Unquality, Part III: Broken Windows at Maryland General Hospital
|
July 2004
There are two questions that all laboratory professionals are asking (or should be) about the scandal at Maryland General Hospital: How could it get this bad? and How could it take so long to discover the problem? Dr. Westgard and Sten Westgard try to answer those questions, and pose an even more important question: Are there more Maryland Generals out there?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Connecting the Dots to Reveal Patterns and Assignable Causes
|
July 2004.
As laboratory scientists, we're taught to connect the dots between control points to look for patterns in the data and underlying causes. As observers of world events, we can also connect the dots and study the patterns to understand the underlying causes. Those events can help us understand the difficulties and importance of quality control practices in the laboratory.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Maryland General Hospital Scandal, Part IV: Inadequate Inspections
|
August 2004.
One of the most dramatic revelations of the Maryland General Hospital scandal was the failure of inspections to uncover the problems in the lab. How did the inspections fail, and can new inspection regimes solve this?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Maryland General Scandal, Part V: Tip of the Iceberg?
|
September 2004.
After a second Congressional Hearing revealed further problems with the inspection process, the "deemed providers" of accreditation are recalibrating their inspections. Still the question remains: Was the scandal at Maryland General Hospital a case of a "few bad apples" or is just the tip of the iceberg?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Quality of Laboratory Testing, Part I
|
September 2004.
There are a lot of opinions about the state of quality of laboratory testing. FDA, CMS, CAP and many other organizations have put forward the myth that testing is great, with the rare "bad apple" that shows up in the headlines. It's time to see the truth, based on real data, about laboratory performance across the country...
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Remarks at the G2 Conference: "No Lab Left Behind"
|
September 2004.
On September 30th, Dr. Westgard received the 2004 Leadership Award for Lifetime Achievement from the Washington G2 Lab Institute. You can read his thanks and remarks upon receiving this honor here.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Vioxx and Values, Vaccines and Votes
|
October 2004.
Note: this is an essay that mixes politics with laboratory healthcare.
When quality problems at a Chiron plant mean that half our flu vaccine shots are contaminated, you know that Laboratory Medicine has become part of politics.What you may not know is that politics have very much affected Laboratory Medicine in return, and the results of the election may well determine the future of our profession.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Quality of Laboratory Testing, Part II: Methodology
|
November 2004.
There's a wealth of data out there on laboratory testing - particularly the data of proficiency testing programs. Dr. Westgard explains the methodology of turning PT results into laboratory performance metrics. The first analysis quickly debunks the notion that QC is no longer necessary for US laboratories.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Quality of Cholesterol Testing
|
December 2004.
In the US, cholesterol testing has been discussed for decades. Specific quality requirements for precision and accuracy have existed on the books for years. But now we can determine if labs are meeting these goals. An analysis of over 9,500 laboratories in 5 different PT organizations reveals the difference between optimistic claims and actual achievements.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Bah, Humbug! Or, how I learned to stop worrying and love EQC
|
December 2004.
Note: this is an essay that mixes politics with laboratory healthcare.
Some of you may have been wondering how I’m coping after the November election. I’m pleased to tell you that I’m over it and have learned my lesson. The American people have spoken and elected to stay the course, right or wrong, so I am going to change my ways. No more liberal idealism; I’m going to accept neoconservative unrealism.
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Quality of Glucose Testing
|
January 2005.
An analysis of over 9,500 laboratories in 5 different PT organizations reveals the difference between optimistic claims and actual achievements..
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Quality of Calcium Testing
|
January 2005.
A recent NIST/Mayo Clinic study found that even a small calibration error/bias of only 0.1 mg/dL could add up to $60 million in healthcare costs. So what is the quality of calcium testing in the US, and what does it cost?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
Blowing the Whistle on the Tip of the Iceberg
|
January 2005.
The Maryland General lab is back in compliance. So we can breathe easier, right? Actually, no. Three other labs have been found with violations. Why are more labs in Maryland having problems? Is this "scandal" still growing?
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Quality of Hemoglobin Testing
|
February 2005.
GHb is a critical test for diabetes control, yet it's not one of the regulated CLIA analytes for proficiency testing. So in addition to determing the actual performance of laboratories for GHb, we need to determine how well labs should be performing. With enough data, though, both tasks can be accomplished...
Read this essay
Back to Top
|
The Quality of PSA Testing
|
May 2005.
The October 2004 issue of Clinical Laboratory Strategies headlined an article “Prostate Cancer Research Declares PSA Era ‘Over’” [1]. Thomas Stamey, who is credited with creating the PSA era, now thinks the test is “all but useless.” Despite this, PSA testing continues across |