| Good Data Wanted - Bad Data Should Not Apply (The STARD Initiative) |
| Written by James O. Westgard, PhD, FACB | |||
|
In 2003, the premier scientific journals announced a new initiative called STARD (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy) What does STARD mean for you? And what does it say about the data being reported in journals today? Dr. Westgard investigates. (Preview) Please Login (at right) or Register to view article
|
Member Login
What's New
Quality Requirments and Standards
- The Quality of Diabetes Testing 2011
- Traceability, Harmonization and Standardization: Why It Matters
- A Dark Secret about the Safety of Medical Devices
- What's the Right Goal?
- Quality of HbA1c, 2011, Part 2
- Quality of HbA1c, 2011
- The Quality Fade
- Quality of Blood Glucose Meters, 2010
- FDA hears concerns on Blood Glucose Meters
- HbA1c in 2010, Part XI
- HbA1c in 2010, Part X
- What's the Q of D? Vitamin D Performance Requirements
- Quality Requirements: The Debate heats up!
- HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of diabetes?
- Need for a System of Quality Standards
- Why Not Evidence-Based Method Specifications?
- Good Data Wanted - Bad Data Should Not Apply (The STARD Initiative)
- "The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth"
- Open Letter to CLSI
- What is the Laboratory's Core Competency?