Won't this ever end? (YES)

MT 520: STILL MORE SAMPLE EXAM
QUESTIONS!



Test 3: QC Planning

Sample Exam Questions for UW-Madison Med Tech Students

Posted 3/18/97

1. For a hemoglobin method, performance is to be assessed at a decision level of 9.0 g/dL. Using the CLIA PT criteria, what would be the allowable total error at this decision level?

2. For a calcium method, performance is to be assessed at decision levels of 7.0 mg/dL and 10.0 mg/dL. Using CLIA PT criteria, what would be the allowable total errors at these two decision levels? Express in both concentration units and percentages.

3. For a glucose method, performance is to be assessed at decision levels of 50 mg/dL, 110 mg/dL, and 250 mg/dL. Using CLIA PT criteria, what would be the allowable total errors at these two decision levels? Express in both concentration units and percentages.

4. For activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), it is of interest to optimize QC performance at a decision level of 35 seconds. Using CLIA PT criteria, what would be the allowable total errors at this decision level?

5. For cyclosporin, which is a non-regulated analyte, what allowable total error would you recommend using?

6. Given a cholesterol method where the CV is 2.0% and bias is 0.0% and the laboratory is using a Levey-Jennings chart with 3SD limits and N of 2, assess the expected performance of the QC procedure.

7. Given the cholesterol data from a method evaluation study, a standard deviation of 5.0 mg/dL was calculated for a control having a mean of 200 mg/dL. The regression equation was Y = 4.0mg/dL + 0.98X for the data in the comparison of methods experiment.

8. Given a new potassium method that shows a CV of 2.5% at a level of 3.5 mmol/L and a bias of 1.0%:

9. For a new sodium method that has a CV of 0.6% and a bias of 0.5% at 140 mmol/L:

10. For a new glucose method that has a CV of 3.0% and a bias of 0.0% at 100 mg/dL.

11. The QC procedure for calcium on our Hitachi analyzer was originally selected based on a quality requirement of 0.5 mg/dL at a decision level of 10.0 mg/dL. Given the CLIA PT criterion that has now been defined through regulations and given our observed CV of 1.5% and bias of 2.0%, what QC procedure could be used to assure we will pass proficency testing?

12. For a potassium method, it has been recommended that you consider using 2s clinical control limits based on a medically allowable CV of 5%. Your method actually shows a CV of 3.0% based on control observations collected in your laboratory.

13. You are looking for a new potassium method. To assure that your laboratory will have no problems satisfying the CLIA PT requirement for analytical quality, what precision specification should you set for purchasing a new analyzer?

14. NCEP recommends that a triglyceride method should have a total allowable error of 14.8% and a CV of 5% or better. How much better should the CV be?


This website is best viewed by Internet Explorer or Netscape2.0 or better.

Copyright © 1997. All rights reserved.

WesTgard® Quality Corporation, P.O. Box2026, Ogunquit ME 03907
Call 207-646-1553 or e-mail westgard@westgard.com

A Message from JOW
QC Lesson of the Month | QC Application of the Month | Question of the Month| Multirule
CLIA Requirements | What's new with WQC | WQC Catalog | Demo Download
Home  | Glossary | WQC Archives| Links | Feedback