| Biologic Variation Database, the 2010 update |
|
|
|
Dr. Carmen Ricos and colleagues explain the 2010 additions and updates to the biological variation database.
Biological variation database, and quality specifications for imprecision, bias and total error (desirable and minimum). The 2010 updateCarmen Ricós,1,2 José-Vicente García-Lario,1,3 Virtudes Alvarez,1,4 Fernando Cava,1,5 Marivi Domenech,1,6 Amparo Hernández,1,4 Carlos-Victor Jiménez,1,7 Joana Minchinela,1,7 Carmen Perich,1,8,Margarita Simón,1,9 Carmen Biosca,1,10 Pilar Fernández-Calle1,111Analytical Quality Committee, Spanish Society of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Pathology (SEQC),
|
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Member Login
What's New

Guest Essay
- Invitation for Patient Percentile Monitoring
- In Favor of "Full QC"
- Using Allowable Total Error in Assay Migration
- Prepare for Inspection
- Frequently-Asked-Questions on Reference Intervals and Biological Variation
- Hitchhiker's Guide to Measurement Uncertainty (MU) in Clinical Laboratories
- Biologic Variation Database, the 2012 update
- Managing Quality in Networked Laboratories
- Dietmar Stockl, QC Reality Check, Part Five
- Saving money by applying TEa and Six Sigma for internal QC.
- Dietmar Stockl, QC Reality Check, Part Four
- Dietmar Stockl, QC Reality Check, Part Three
- Dietmar Stockl, QC Reality Check, Parts One and Two
- Interpretation of Differences in Serial Troponin Results
- Upgrading Quality Control in Molecular Diagnostics
- Stability Testing and CLSI EP25-A
- Biologic Variation Database, the 2010 update
- Rilibak: Quality Goals the German way
- Are "Scientific Statements" the Scientific Truth?
- Sysmex Perspective on Sigma-metrics




