QC- BACK
TO BASICS
|
A word from
Dr. Westgard |
|
I heard this story from a Medical Technologist who was inspecting
a laboratory. She observed a method that was in very good control
- in fact, too good control because all the points on the control
charts were within plus or minus one standard deviation of the
means for the control materials. On inquiring about how the control
limits were set, she learned that the laboratory was using the
manufacturer's recommended range to estimate the standard deviation
(s), then calculating 3s control limits. A quick calculation from
the real control data collected by the laboratory showed that
the standard deviations being observed were about 1/3 of those
used in calculating the control limits, which meant that the nominal
3s control limits corresponded to actual statistical control limits
of 9s (or a 19s control rule). It's no wonder the laboratory
never had any control problems with this method! It would take
a systematic error of 10 to 15 times the size of the standard
deviation before it would be detected by the QC procedure. The
method would probably have to run out of reagents before the QC
procedure would detect that something was wrong.
This story shows that plotting points on control charts does
not constitute quality control. There's a right way to do QC if
the purpose is to assure that test results provide the quality
necessary for patient care. Somehow in this highly advanced medical
industry, in this age of high technology, in this era of making
healthcare an efficient business, and with today's focus on cost
and the bottom line, some of the basics are being forgotten. That's
why we've begun providing some lessons on basic QC. The most basic
and fundamental expectation of a laboratory is that it provides
correct test results. Statistical QC practices are critical for
assuring test results are correct.
QC is like Safety
QC practices, like safety practices, are recognized to be important
if something bad happens, but they seems to be a waste of time
and effort when things are working okay. The key to their success
is advance planning, anticipation of what might go wrong, warnings
when things are going wrong, and a planned course of action to
respond to a problem and minimize the damage. The similarity between
quality and safety processes provides a useful analogy: think
of the QC problem as a fire and think of the QC procedure as a
smoke detector. Many people agree that a smoke detector is necessary,
but still think it's a waste of time to have an evacuation plan,
fire drills, and training with fire extinguishers, at least until
such time as a real fire occurs. Then it suddenly becomes relevant,
and hopefully its not too late to read the yellow emergency response
guide posted in the laboratory.
Safety is part of basic training in the laboratory. So is quality
control. We need to keep at it if we are to maintain a good program,
prevent unfortunate events, detect problems, and respond quickly
when they occur. We are required to periodically review our safety
procedures and participate in planned drills. We also need to
review our QC procedures and be sure they accomplish what they're
supposed to - they're supposed to detect errors, but they shouldn't
give a lot of false alarms that wastes time and effort.
QC Basic Training 101
Here's a minimum that everyone should understand. This should
be part of the training for anyone who performs a laboratory test,
including personnel in point-of-care applications.
- QC - The idea presents the concept
of measurement variation and its use to monitor method performance
with the aid of a control chart.
- QC - The Levey-Jennings Control Chart
describes construction of a control chart, the plotting of
control data, and interpretation of control results.
- QC - The Practice provides a summary
of the overall process of selecting, implementing, and operating
a QC procedure. It provides links to more detailed materials
if there is interest to pursue any of the topics further.
QC Basic Training 102
Add the following for laboratory technicians who work under
supervision.
- QC - The Materials discusses the
selection of control materials and factors that affect their
usefulness in a laboratory.
- QC - The Calculations explains
how to calculate the mean and standard deviation, control limits,
and cumulative limits.
- QC - The Westgard Rules describes
multirule procedures that use a combination of control rules
to make decisions. It provides detailed graphics that demonstrate
a wide variety of control rules.
- QC - The Multirule Interpretation
shows how to interpret multiple rules with multiple control materials
and multiple runs.
QC Basic Training 103
Add the following for medical technologists, clinical laboratory
scientists, clinical chemists, who work independently, have responsiblities
for managing specific analytical systems and testing processes,
or are responsible for supervising other laboratory personnel.
- QC - The Regulations provides a
summary of guidelines from government and acceditation organizations,
particularly CLIA, CAP, and JCAHO.
- Medical Decision Levels is a tabular
summary from Dr. Bernard Statland's book that describes the critical
concentrations where medical judgments are often made. Knowledge
of these levels is useful in selecting appropriate control materials.
- QC - The Chances of Rejection
gets into the "false alarm" and "true alarm"
characteristics of different control rules with different numbers
of control measurements.
- Multirule - the original clinical
chemistry paper provides a detailed discussion of the whys and
hows of multirule QC.
- QC - The Out-of-Control Problem
provides some guidelines on how to respond to out-of-control
situations, with the emphasis on identifying and solving the
problem.
- QC - The Records deals with the
organization and documentation needed for quality management.
- QC - The Planning Process introduces
approaches that can be used to select the appropriate control
rules and number of control measurements.
Advanced Training for QC Planning
For those QC specialists, supervisors, managers, and directors
who want more advanced training in QC Planning, other materials
are already available on this website (see Archives),
as well as an CD training course in "Quality
Control Planning" accredited by AACC for ACCENT continuing
education credits.
Future Additions
We continue to make additions to the Basic QC training materials,
with emphasis on detailed applications for different tests, different
instruments, and different areas of the laboratory. We are well
aware that theory and practice are often best learned from a specific
application that is of interest to the individual learner. We
intend to develop a series of detailed applications that cover
a wide variety of interests in the laboratory.
We also created a series on Basic Method Evaluation. What experiments
are necessary? How do you perform the experiments? How much data
needs to be collected? How to you analyze the data statistically?
How do you judge whether method performance is acceptable for
your laboratory? We try to answer all these questions in the series
Any feedback on these materials and their potential uses will
be appreciated. While the web is a powerful medium for reaching
out anywhere in the world, there is a certain loss when you can't
see the expressions on the faces of the students. Those expressions
are often the best feedback on the success of the materials and
the learning process.
Other Essays:
- Myths of Quality
- Putting Quality into Quality Control
- Assuring Quality through Total Quality Management
- Trends in quality management: Utilization and Outcomes
- Quality Goals, Requirements, & Specifications
- Future Directions in Quality Control
- The Myth of Medical Decision Limits
- Quality by Design
- Tools and Technology for QC Training
- Education and Training for Analytical Quality Management, Part I
- Mapping the Road to Analytical Quality with OPSpecs Charts
- Quality and Commerce
- QC - Back to Basics
- Education and Training for Analytical Quality Management, Part II: Developing Web-courses
- Method Validation - The Inner, Hidden, Deeper, Secret Meaning
- Education and Training in Analytical Quality Management, Part III: Basic QC Training
- Electronic QC and the Total Testing Process
- From Rules and Tools to Technology and Training (Beijing)
- Quality Requirements: the debate heats up
- Z-Stats: A treat and a treatment
- The Need for a System of Quality Standards
- What's wrong with traditional QC?
- To be Uncertain or In Error? That is the Question
- QC 2000
- Education and Training for Analytical Quality Management, Part IV: Interactive Training Tools
- Do's and Dont's of QC
- The Abbott Consent Decree: A Wake-Up Call
- WQC Y2K
- Sage Advice about new approaches to Quality Control
- EZ Rules for Assuring Quality
- Who will care to quality tomorrow?
- Quality is Job 1 when the rubber meets the road
- Errors in reasoning about Laboratory errors
- Six Sigma Quality Management & Lab Precision
- Six Sigma Quality Managment & Requisite Lab QC
- 2001: Year of the Odyssey essays
- CLIA Postponed again and again and again
- Repeated, Repeated, Got Lucky
- Six Sigma Staffing Strategies
- Technology for Implementing QC Right
- $aving the Cost$ of Poor Quality
|
- Has Quality been "Enronned"?
- Why not Evidence-Based Method Specifications?
- Quality: "I think I got it!"
- Cooking the Books: Does it happen in the Lab?
- CLIA QC Clearance - A momentous happening
- Signs of Six Sigma
- Good Data Wanted, Bad Data Need Not Apply
- Final, final, final, final, final CLIA Rules
- The Truth Standard for Quality
- It's an Honor: Reflections on being a Teacher
- 2004 JCAHO Patient Safety Goals
- ISO Says So
- Medical Errors: Complexity and Its Solutions
- Giving Thanks for 2003: Observations on the state of Quality
- Autoverification: Taking QC to the next level - is that up or down?
- Think straight, Talk straight
- The Gospel According to ISO
- More on Eqc and "Quality-Less" Compliance
- Testing Equivalent Quality: A better way
- The Final Word on the Final Rule?
- Hear, Hear, Hearings on Untruth and Unquality, Part I
- Hearings on Untruth, Part II: Cracks
- Hearings on Untruth, Part III: Facts
- Hearings on Untruth, Part III: Broken Windows
- Connecting the Dots
- Hearings on Untruth, Part IV: Inadequate Inspections
- Hearings on Untruth, Part V: Bad Apples or Tip of the Iceberg?
- The Quality of Laboratory Testing, Part I
- No Laboratory Left Behind
- Vioxx and Values, Vaccines and Votes
- The Quality of Laboratory Testing: Methodology
- The Quality of Cholesterol Testing
- Bah, Humbug! How I learned to love EQC
- The Quality of Glucose Testing
- The Quality of Calcium Testing
- Blowing the Whistle on the Tip of the Iceberg
- The Quality of Glycohemoglobin
- The Quality of PSA Testing
- Solutions for the Taxing Problem of QC
- The quality of Coagulation Testing
- The variability of estimates from PT surveys
- Links to India, Part I
- Test Quality vs. Method Performance
- QC: Not just a technicality
- 2005 in Review: 100,000 miles to Quality
- Unannounced Inspections, Unknown Consequences
- Hopeful Healthcare in a Fearful Society
- Quality Indicators and Benchmarks
- Trouble with Tracking Tests
|

Copyright © 2000. All rights reserved.
Westgard QC, 7614 Gray Fox Trail, Madison WI 53717
Call 608-833-4718 or e-mail us at westgard@westgard.com
A Message from
JOW
QC Lessons | QC
Applications | Questions | Multirule
CLIA | What's
New? | Catalog | Demo
Download
Home | Glossary
| ARCHIVES | Links
| Feedback