This lesson discusses one of the cornerstones of QC practice. We can no longer take for granted that everyone knows how to build a control chart, plot the control values, and interpret those results correctly. Patricia L. Barry, co-author of Cost-Effective Quality Control: Managing the Quality and Productivity of Analytical Processes, provides a primer on how to construct, use, and interpret the Levey-Jennings chart.
You can link here to an online calculator which will calculate control limits for you.
This exercise is intended to show, in step-wise fashion, how to construct a Levey-Jennings control chart, plot control values, and interpret those results. This assumes you already have (a) selected appropriate control materials, (b) analyzed those materials to characterize method performance by collecting a minimum of 20 measurements over at least 10 days, (c) calculated the mean and standard deviation of those data, and (d) selected the number of control measurements to be used per run and (e) selected the control rules to be applied.
See QC - The Materials for more information about selecting appropriate control materials. See QC - The Calculations for detailed information about calculating the mean and standard deviation. See QC - The Planning Process for a description of the approach, tools, and technology available to select QC procedures on the basis of the quality required for a test and the performance observed for a method.
For a cholesterol method, two different commercial control products have been selected that have concentrations near the important medical decision levels of 200 mg/dL and 240 mg/dL identified by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines for test interpretation. The materials were analyzed once per day for a period of twenty days. From these data, the means and standard deviations were calculated to be:
Control 1 | Mean=200 | smeas= 4.0 mg/dL, or 2.0% CV |
Control 2 | Mean=250 | smeas= 5.0 mg/dL, or 2.0% CV |
Each of the two control materials will be analyzed once per run, providing a total of two control measurements per run. Control status will be judged by either the 12s or 13s rule. These rules are defined as follows:
The 12s rule is very commonly used today, and while it provides high error detection, the use of 2s control limits gives an expected high level of false rejections. The 13s rule provides an alternative QC procedure that has lower false rejections, but also lower error detection. In this exercise, you will see how to apply both QC procedures and also get a feel for the difference in their performance.
Two sets of control limits will be needed to implement the rules described above. The first set uses 2s control limits (for implementation of the 12s rule) calculated as the mean plus or minus 2 times the standard deviation. The second set uses 3s control limits (for implementation of the 13s rule) calculated as the mean plus or minus 3 times the standard deviation.
For this example, Control 1 has a mean of 200 and a standard deviation of 4 mg/dL.
The upper control limit would be:
200 + 2*4, which is 208 mg/dL.
The lower control limit would be:
200 - 2*4, or 192 mg/dL.
Use the Javascript Control Limit Calculator to calculate these answers
You should end up with 3s control limits of 188 and 212 for Control 1. For Control 2, you should have 2s control limits of 240 and 260 and 3s control limits of 235 and 265.
This exercise shows how to construct control charts manually using standard graph paper. For this exercise, graph paper having 10x10 or 20x20 lines per inch works well. You will need two sheets, one for each chart of the two control materials. While it is possible to prepare both charts on a single sheet, this may reduce the readability of the control charts. If you do not have graph paper available at this time, print out the lower resolution grids below.
Click here to get a larger chart you can print out separately.
Click here to get a larger chart you can print out separately.
Click here if you want to print a larger version of this chart separately.
Click here if you want to print a larger version of this chart separately.
Once the control charts have been set up, you start plotting the new control values that are being collected as part of your routine work. The idea is that, for a stable testing process, the new control measurements should show the same distribution as the past control measurements. That means it will be somewhat unusual to see a control value that exceeds a 2s control limit and very rare to see a control value that exceeds a 3s control limit. If the method is unstable and has some kind of problem, then there should be a higher chance of seeing control values that exceed the control limits. Therefore, when the control values fall within the expected distribution, you classify the run to be "in-control," accept the results, and report patient test results. When the control values fall outside the expected distribution, you classify the run as "out-of-control," reject the test values, and do not report patient test results.
Cholesterol example where: |
||||||
Day | Control 1 Value |
Control 2 Value |
12s Rule Violation |
13s Rule Violation |
Accept(A), Warning (W), or Reject(R)? |
Comments |
1 | 200 | 247 | ||||
2 | 205 | 250 | ||||
3 | 195 | 255 | ||||
4 | 202 | 243 | ||||
5 | 186 | 254 | ||||
6 | 207 | 263 | ||||
7 | 194 | 251 | ||||
8 | 209 | 264 | ||||
9 | 200 | 253 | ||||
10 | 196 | 244 | ||||
11 | 190 | 261 | ||||
12 | 204 | 254 | ||||
13 | 196 | 239 | ||||
14 | 207 | 236 | ||||
15 | 200 | 250 | ||||
16 | 205 | 259 | ||||
17 | 209 | 257 | ||||
18 | 197 | 256 | ||||
19 | 196 | 249 | ||||
20 | 198 | 257 | ||||
21 | 197 | 241 | ||||
22 | 195 | 255 | ||||
23 | 198 | 250 | ||||
24 | 199 | 259 | ||||
25 | 191 | 247 | ||||
26 | 197 | 242 | ||||
27 | 190 | 256 | ||||
28 | 202 | 246 |